Cleveland Clinic

View the Disease Management Project
Table of Contents

Colonic Disease

Reviewed July 14, 2004

H. Nail
Aydin, MD

 

Department of
Colorectal Surgery

Feza Remzi, MD

 

Department of
Colorectal Surgery

Copyright 2004
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

TREATMENT

More acute advanced disease can be treated surgically on an emergent basis where surgical options may vary according to the preoperative factors, the patient's condition, and intraoperative staging of peritonitis. These all contribute to the peritonitis scoring system (Table 5). There are many different staging systems that depend on the stage of presentation of intra-abdominal pathology for evaluating and treating. Among these systems, the Hinchey classification,7,49 recommended in the guidelines for treatment of diverticular disease by the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (http://www.fascrs.org/
displaycommon.cfm?an=1&subarticlenbr=150) and the American Gastroenterological Association, is the most commonly used tool for making the surgical decision based on intraoperative findings (Table 6). Surgical treatment options, with the contribution of auxiliary methods like CT-guided drainage and on-table lavage to downstage the type and complexity of the surgical operations, may be based on the Hinchey classification.7,50

Table 5:
Peritonitis Severity Score
  • Age (<70 years versus >70 years)
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists score (I-II versus III versus IV-V)
  • Underlying disease (ischemic colitis)
  • Hinchey Peritonitis Score (I-II versus III-IV)
  • Preoperative organ failure
  • Immunocompromised status
Adapted from reference 57.

The most commonly performed procedures are either single-stage or two-stage procedures that can be performed either laparoscopically (in experienced hands) or by the conventional open method, depending on the severity and stage of disease, the patient's overall condition, and comorbidities. Primary resection and anastomosis without a protective stoma is the so-called single-stage procedure that is usually the treatment of choice for patients without immunosuppression or immunocompromised status presenting with either uncomplicated diverticulitis or a clinical picture that could be downstaged by means of the above-mentioned methods (Figure 3). A two-stage procedure is commonly indicated for patients with substantial fecal contamination, inflammation, and immunocompromised or immunosuppressed status. The two-stage procedure consists of either initial resection of the diseased segment and elective restoration of the intestinal continuity later on (Hartmann's procedure) or resection and primary anastomosis with a proximal loop ileostomy that again is to be closed at a later appropriate time (Figure 4). The most commonly performed two-stage operation is Hartmann's procedure, which has great variability of morbidity and mortality related to the selection and application criteria to different patient populations (Figure 5). Mortality ranges from 2.6% to 36.8%.51-56

To summarize, the surgical treatment options and their stage-related clinical applications are as follows.7,9,57 Hinchey stage 1 disease (Figure 6) is initially treated conservatively using IV antibiotics for the first 48 hours. If the clinical condition of the patient fails to improve within this period, a repeat CT is usually indicated. An increase in abscess size on CT renders CT-guided drainage the next available treatment option in the treatment algorithm. Patients with abscesses that are not amenable to CT-guided drainage or in whom signs and symptoms of peritonitis persist despite appropriate antibiotic therapy and percutaneous drainage are candidates for surgical intervention. In stage 2, diverticulitis is associated with distant abscesses (retroperitoneal or pelvic) (Figure 7). Magnitude, location, patient's clinical factors determining timing of surgery and treatment modality. Again, small abscesses may resolve with antibiotic therapy and bowel rest. Large diverticular abscesses can be either percutaneously or surgically drained. Percutaneous drainage may allow stabilization of the patient and avoidance of a temporary stoma and a second operation. Abscesses that are not amenable to CT-guided percutaneous drainage and those that are resistant to conservative therapy in terms of clinical improvement require surgical treatment. In extraordinary conditions, as in an immunocompromised or toxic patient or in a patient with marked pelvic inflammatory residue after resection of a diseased colonic segment, a proximal loop ileostomy might be indicated (Figure 4) The occasional patient can undergo primary resection and anastomosis. Stage 3 disease (Figure 8) is a state of purulent peritonitis, which is a surgical emergency requiring preliminary optimization and immediate resuscitation with IV fluids, broad-spectrum antibiotics, cardiovascular support when indicated, and prompt surgical therapy. Depending on the degree of contamination, magnitude of sepsis, and timeliness of surgical intervention, a 6% to 35% mortality rate can be expected. The Hartmann procedure is still the main surgical option according to the literature (Figure 5); however, resection and anastomosis with loop ileostomy may still be an option in selected cases. Several retrospective analyses suggest that primary resection and anastomosis is preferable.58-61 It is difficult to assess the relative safety of primary resection and anastomosis with or without loop ileostomy versus a Hartmann procedure. On the other hand, one must also consider the 30% possibility that Hartmann's procedure is irreversible and the additional morbidities that might be encountered related to this procedure. In patients with a score of IV/V on the scale of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, preoperative organ failure is best managed without an anastomosis. ASA score along with the other criteria mentioned in the peritonitis severity score (Table 5) are useful in decision making and treatment of these patients.57

Again, patients with an immunocompromised status, those more than 70 years old, and those with signs and symptoms of systemic toxicity should have a diversion (Figure 4). In stage 4 disease, which is fecal peritonitis (Figure 9), patients require surgical intervention after preliminary optimization and resuscitation. Almost all patients should be treated with Hartmann's procedure and drainage. In rare prohibitive cases with adhesions and conditions that hinder effective segmental resection, peritoneal lavage, proximal fecal diversion, omentoplasty, and possible drainage may be considered (Figure 10).

 

Chapter Outline

Treatment

Outcomes

References


Part 1:

Definition

Prevalence

Pathophysiology

Signs and
Symptoms

Diagnosis

Treatment

 

OUTCOMES

The outcomes of stage-related surgical treatment modalities have been reviewed and reported in the literature. In a retrospective study, 53 (87%) patients were treated with resection and non-diverted coloproctostomy for stage I disease. In this group, only 2 (3.8%) anastomotic leaks occurred, and the observed overall morbidity rate was only 22%. In stage II disease, 27(69%) underwent primary resection with coloproctostomy. Eleven patients out of 27 had proximal diversion whereas 16 had none. The overall leak rate was identical at 3.8%, but the group's morbidity rate of 30% was slightly increased.62

According to the literature, laparoscopic treatment of diverticulitis especially in Hinchey I and II disease can be performed without additional morbidity and mortality. In a comperative study, patients with Hinchey II disease had no statistical difference between complication rates for laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparotomy.63,64

In Stage III and IV disease, mortality rates of surgical treatment options such as diversion and suture closure, Hartmann's procedure (resection and end colostomy), primary resection and anastomosis, and finally resection with proximal diversion were reviewed and reported as 26%, 12%, 9% and 6% for each individual operation type respectively.58 The outcomes as given favor resection with coloproctostomy over Hartmann's procedure. However, in most of these studies they considered using primary resection with coloproctostomy only in selected patients without any randomization. Therefore, in stage III and IV disease this still needs to be tested by means of prospective randomized trials before making any recommendation regarding its therapeutic application.

Laparoscopic surgery for acute complicated disease in association with Hinchey III and IV has not been generally accepted as the treatment of choice. However, evidence shows that laparoscopy has been used as a diagnostic tool along with the laparoscopy assisted- lavage procudere in Hinchey III patients.65

In summary, diverticulitis is a commonly encountered clinical entity in daily practice and needs to be taken into consideration especially in the differential diagnosis of patients with abdominal complaints. The increase in morbidity and mortality is determined to be associated with the stage of the disease. It is worthwhile to emphasize that it requires a multidisciplinary approach for its staging, diagnosis and treatment.

Return to Medicine Index

REFERENCES
  1. Burkitt DP, Walker AR, Painter NS. Effect of dietary fibre on stools and the transit-times, and its role in the causation of disease. Lancet. 1972;2:1408-12.

  2. Burkitt D. Diverticular disease of the colon epidemiological evidence relating it to fibre-depleted diets. Trans Med Soc Lond. 1973;89:81-4.

  3. Roberts P, Abel M, Rosen L, et al. Practice parameters for sigmoid diverticulitis. The Standards Task Force American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:125-32.

  4. Welch CE, Allen AW, Donaldson GA. An appraisal of resection of the colon for diverticulitis of the sigmoid. Ann Surg. 1953;138:332-43.

  5. Boles RS Jr., Jordan SM. The clinical significance of diverticulosis. Gastroenterology. 1958.35:579-82.

  6. Waugh JM, Walt AJ. Current trends in the surgical treatment of diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon. Surg Clin North Am. 1962;42:1267-76.

  7. Wong WD, Wexner SD, Lowry A, et al. Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis—supporting documentation. The Standards Task Force. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000;43:290-7.

  8. Aldoori WH, Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, et al. Prospective study of physical activity and the risk of symptomatic diverticular disease in men. Gut. 1995;36:276-82.

  9. Stollman NH, Raskin JB. Diagnosis and management of diverticular disease of the colon in adults. Ad Hoc Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:3110-21.

  10. Lee YS. Diverticular disease of the large bowel in Singapore. An autopsy survey. Dis Colon Rectum. 1986;29:330-5.

  11. Richter S, vd Linde J, Dominok GW. Diverticular disease. Pathology and clinical aspects based on 368 autopsy cases. Zentralbl Chir. 1991;116:991-8.

  12. Schoetz DJ Jr. Diverticular disease of the colon: a century-old problem. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:703-9.

  13. Painter NS, Burkitt DP. Diverticular disease of the colon: a deficiency disease of Western civilization. Br Med J. 1971;2:450-4.

  14. Parks TG. Natural history of diverticular disease of the colon. Clin Gastroenterol. 1975;4:53-69.

  15. Acosta JA, Grebenc ML, Doberneck RC, McCarthy JD, Fry DE. Colonic diverticular disease in patients 40 years old or younger. Am Surg. 1992;58:605-7.

  16. Ambrosetti P, Robert JH, Witzig JA, et al. Acute left colonic diverticulitis in young patients. J Am Coll Surg. 1994;179:156-60.

  17. Konvolinka CW, Acute diverticulitis under age forty. Am J Surg. 1994;167:562-5.

  18. Aldoori WH, Giovannucci EL, Rockett HR, Sampson L, Rimm EB, Willett WC. A prospective study of dietary fiber types and symptomatic diverticular disease in men. J Nutr. 1998;128:714-9.

  19. Aldoori WH, Giovannucci EL, Rimm EB, Wing AL, Trichopoulos DV, Willett WC. A prospective study of alcohol, smoking, caffeine, and the risk of symptomatic diverticular disease in men. Ann Epidemiol. 1995;5:221-8.

  20. Meyers MA, Volberg F, Katzen B, Alonso D, Abbott G. The angioarchitecture of colonic diverticula. Significance in bleeding diverticulosis. Radiology. 1973;108:249-61.

  21. Meyers MA, et al. Pathogenesis of bleeding colonic diverticulosis. Gastroenterology, 1976;71:577-83.

  22. Wess L, Eastwood MA, Wess TJ, Busuttil A, Miller A. Cross linking of collagen is increased in colonic diverticulosis. Gut. 1995;37:91-4.

  23. Waldron DJ, Gill RC, Bowes KL. Pressure response of human colon to intraluminal distension. Dig Dis Sci. 1989;34:1163-7.

  24. Ford MJ, Camilleri M, Wiste JA, Hanson RB.
    Differences in colonic tone and phasic response to a meal in the transverse and sigmoid human colon. Gut. 1995;37:264-9.


  25. Thomson HJ, et al. The submucosa of the human colon. J Ultrastruct Mol Struct Res. 1986;96:22-30.

  26. Thomson HJ, et al. Submucosal collagen changes in the normal colon and in diverticular disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1987;2:208-13.

  27. Stumpf M, et al. Increased distribution of collagen type III and reduced expression of matrix metalloproteinase 1 in patients with diverticular disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2001;16:271-5.

  28. Whiteway J, Morson BC. Elastosis in diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. Gut. 1985;26:258-66.

  29. Sandberg LB, Soskel NT, Leslie JG. Elastin structure, biosynthesis, and relation to disease states. N Engl J Med. 1981;304:566-79.

  30. Wess L, Eastwood M, Busuttil A, Edwards C, Miller A. An association between maternal diet and colonic diverticulosis in an animal model. Gut. 1996;39:423-7.

  31. Smith AN. Colonic muscle in diverticular disease. Clin Gastroenterol. 1986;15:917-35.

  32. Painter NS, Truelove SC, Ardran GM, Tuckey M. Segmentation and the Localization of Intraluminal Pressures in the Human Colon, with Special Reference to the Pathogenesis of Colonic Diverticula. Gastroenterology. 1965;49:169-77.

  33. Ludeman L, Warren BF, Shepherd NA. The pathology of diverticular disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;16:543-62.

  34. Colcock BP, Stahmann FD. Fistulas complicating diverticular disease of the sigmoid colon. Ann Surg. 1972;175:838-46.

  35. Pontari MA, McMillen MA, Garvey RH, Ballantyne GH. Diagnosis and treatment of enterovesical fistulae. Am Surg. 1992;58:258-63.

  36. Woods RJ, Lavery IC, Fazio VW, Jagelman DG, Weakley FL. Internal fistulas in diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:591-6.

  37. Fearnhead NS, Mortensen NJ. Clinical features and differential diagnosis of diverticular disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;16:577-93.

  38. Padidar AM, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Dolph JF. Differentiating sigmoid diverticulitis from carcinoma on CT scans: mesenteric inflammation suggests diverticulitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:81-3.

  39. Stefansson T, Nyman R, Nilsson S, Ekbom A, Pahlman L. Diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon. A comparison of CT, colonic enema and laparoscopy. Acta Radiol. 1997;38:313-9.

  40. Echenique Elizondo M, Amondarain Arratibel JA. Barium-induced peritonitis. An infrequent but persistent picture. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2000;23:25-6.

  41. Schwerk WB, Schwarz S, Rothmund M. Sonography in acute colonic diverticulitis. A prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:1077-84.

  42. Schwerk WB, Schwarz S, Rothmund M, Arnold R. Colon diverticulitis: imaging diagnosis with ultrasound—a prospective study. Z Gastroenterol. 1993;31:294-300.

  43. Doringer E. Computerized tomography of colonic diverticulitis. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging. 1992;33:421-35.

  44. Hulnick DH, Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, Naidich DP, Bosniak MA. Computed tomography in the evaluation of diverticulitis. Radiology. 1984;152:491-5.

  45. Hulnick DH, Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ. Diverticulitis: evaluation by CT and contrast enema. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149:644-6.

  46. Cho KC, Morehouse HT, Alterman DD, Thornhill BA. Sigmoid diverticulitis: diagnostic role of CT—comparison with barium enema studies. Radiology. 1990;176:111-5.

  47. Schechter, S, Mulvey J, Eisenstat TE. Management of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis: results of a survey. Dis Colon Rectum. 1999;42:470-5; discussion 475-6.

  48. Wolff BG, Devine RM. Surgical management of diverticulitis. Am Surg. 2000;66:153-6.

  49. Hinchey EJ, Schaal PG, Richards GK. Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg. 1978;12:85-109.

  50. Wexner SD, Moscovitz ID. Laparoscopic colectomy in diverticular and Crohn's disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2000;80:1299-319.

  51. Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP. Surgical management of diverticulitis. The role of the Hartmann procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1983;26:429-32.

  52. Bakker FC, Hoitsma HF, Den Otter G. The Hartmann procedure. Br J Surg. 1982;69:580-2.

  53. Ling L, Aberg T. Hartmann procedure. Acta Chir Scand. 1984;150:413-7.

  54. Bell GA, ON Panton. Hartmann resection for perforated sigmoid diverticulitis. A retrospective study of the Vancouver General Hospital experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27:253-6.

  55. Hulkko OA, et al. The Hartmann procedure for the treatment of colorectal emergencies. Acta Chir Scand. 1986;152:531-5.

  56. Berry AR, et al. Emergency surgery for complicated diverticular disease. A five-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989;32:849-54.

  57. Biondo S, Ramos E, Deiros M, Prognostic factors for mortality in left colonic peritonitis: a new scoring system. J Am Coll Surg. 2000;191:635-42.

  58. Krukowski ZH, NA Matheson. Emergency surgery for diverticular disease complicated by generalized and faecal peritonitis: a review. Br J Surg. 1984;71:921-7.

  59. Maggard MA, Chandler CF, Schmit PJ, Bennion RS, Hines OJ, Thompson JE. Surgical diverticulitis: treatment options. Am Surg. 2001;67:1185-9.

  60. Blair NP, Germann E. Surgical management of acute sigmoid diverticulitis. Am J Surg. 2002;183:525-8.

  61. Wedell J, Banzhaf G, Chaoui R, Fischer R, Reichmann J. Surgical management of complicated colonic diverticulitis. Br J Surg. 1997;84:380-3.

  62. Belmonte C, Klas JV, Perez JJ, et al. The Hartmann procedure. First choice or last resort in diverticular disease? Arch Surg. 1996;131:612-5; discussion 616-7.

  63. Sher ME, Agachan F, Bortul M, Nogueras JJ, Weiss EG, Wexner SD. Laparoscopic surgery for diverticulitis. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:264-7.

  64. Kockerling F, Schneider C, Reymond MA, et al. Laparoscopic resection of sigmoid diverticulitis. Results of a multicenter study. Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:567-71.

  65. Bouillot JL, Berthou JC, Champault G, et al. Elective laparoscopic colonic resection for diverticular disease: results of a multicenter study in 179 patients. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1320-3.

Disclaimer