Cleveland Clinic

View the Disease Management Project
Table of Contents


Reviewed July 14, 2004

Ann R.
Kooken, MD

Ann R. Kooken, MD

Department of
Dermatology

Kenneth J.
Tomecki, MD

Kenneth J. Tomecki, MD

Department of
Dermatology

Print Chapter

Copyright 2002
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

 
DEFINITION

 

Chapter Outline

Definition

Prevalence

Pathophysiology

Signs and
Symptoms

Diagnosis

Therapy

Outcomes

References

National Guidelines

American Academy of Dermatology

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

An adverse drug reaction is any unintended or undesirable response to a medication given at an appropriate dose.1 Adverse drug reactions can be predictable or unpredictable. Predictable reactions are dose dependent, whereas unpredictable reactions are not. Additionally, predictable adverse events, eg, toxicity, side effects, and drug interactions, are related to the pharmacologic actions of the drug, but unpredictable reactions, eg, idiosyncratic and allergic reactions, are not. An allergic or hypersensitivity reaction is any adverse immunologic response to a drug or its metabolites.2 Any organ may exhibit an allergic reaction, but the skin is most commonly affected because it has both metabolic and immunologic functions.3

PREVALENCE
The incidence of serious drug reactions in hospitalized patients in the United States is 6.7%, and 0.32% of all affected patients have fatal reactions. Based on these figures 100,000 deaths per year result from adverse drug reactions, making them one of the leading causes of death in hospitalized patients. The incidence of adverse reactions rises to 15.1% when both serious and nonserious reactions are calculated.4 Cutaneous reactions comprise approximately 2% to 3% of all adverse drug reactions,3 and approximately 1 in 1,000 hospitalized patients has a severe cutaneous drug reaction.5
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Various patient- and drug-related factors contribute to the risk of adverse drug reactions.2 Patient factors include age (highest prevalence in neonates and the elderly); sex (more common in women); underlying disease (more common in patients with renal or hepatic disease, which decreases the ability to metabolize and clear a drug6); genetics (differences in metabolizing enzymes may explain response variability7); and prior drug reactions. Drug factors include route of administration (more common with topical and intramuscular administration and less so with intravenous administration; oral route is safest1); duration (more common with chronic or frequent use rather than short-term or intermittent use2); dose; and variation in metabolism.2 Reactions are more common for drugs with low therapeutic indices, high levels of drug-drug interactions, and a tendency to form reactive intermediates or toxins.6 Even environmental factors may contribute to an adverse reaction. For example, ultraviolet light can alter the immunogenicity of certain medications, and viral infection, such as mononucleosis, can exacerbate the well-documented ampicillin-induced morbilliform reaction.8

Allergic drug reactions have certain distinguishing features (Table 1) that separate them from other forms of adverse drug reactions.9 Using the Gell-Coombs classification, there are four types of allergic reactions: type I, an immediate hypersensitivity reaction; type II, a cytotoxic antibody reaction; type III, an immune complex reaction; and type IV, a delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction.3 Type I reactions, which include urticaria and angioedema, occur when drug-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies induce the release of inflammatory mediators from mast cells and basophils. Type II and type III allergic reactions are late-occurring and have various cutaneous manifestations. Such reactions are driven by drug-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and/or immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies, which develop several hours after drug intake. The resultant antibody-antigen complexes lead to complement activation or the release of cytotoxic cells.10 Type IV reactions are mediated by drug-specific T lymphocytes and include allergic contact dermatitis.3

Table 1:
Features of Allergic Drug Reactions
  • Initial exposure or treatment produces no adverse event
  • The reaction occurs a few days
    after re-exposure
  • The reaction occurs in a small proportion of
    the population
  • The reaction occurs at doses below the
    therapeutic rang
    e
  • The reaction can be reproduced upon
    re-exposure to the suspected drug or drugs of a similar chemical structure

Nonallergic cutaneous drug reactions include toxicity, drug-drug interactions, exacerbation of preexisting dermatologic diseases, and nonimmunologic activation of effector pathways. For example, direct release of mast cell mediators and activation of complement without antibody formation are probably the way in which radiocontrast media cause a reaction. Drugs also may alter arachidonic acid metabolism, explaining why aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) can induce anaphylactic-type reactions without the formation of antibodies. Despite extensive research, the mechanism of many drug reactions remains unknown.8

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS

Adverse drug reactions can be systemic or organ specific. Systemic reactions include anaphylaxis, vasculitis, serum sickness, and drug fever. Organ-specific reactions commonly affect the skin but can be hematologic, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal.3 The most common types of adverse cutaneous reactions are exanthems (46%), followed by urticaria (23%), fixed drug eruptions (10%), erythema multiforme (5.4%), and all other forms (less than 5%).9 Table 2 summarizes the various cutaneous adverse reactions and the drugs that commonly cause them.

Exanthem is often characterized by symmetric erythematous macules and papules.
Figure 1

Exanthems
Exanthems can be maculopapular, morbilliform, or erythematous (Figure 1). They are often bilateral and symmetric in distribution and typically begin on the trunk or on pressure areas of bedridden patients. Mucosal involvement varies. Pruritus is also variable, but usually present. Differentiating between drug-induced and infectious exanthems is often difficult. Drug-induced exanthems usually occur within a week of drug therapy, but may occur as late as 2 weeks after therapy has ended. They often last 1 to 2 weeks and have a benign course. Any drug can cause an exanthem, but the most common agents are beta-lactam antibiotics, sulfonamides, erythromycin, gentamicin, anticonvulsants, and gold salts.2,8,9

Periorbital congestion is common
with angioedema.
Figure 2

Urticaria and Angioedema
Urticaria and angioedema are less common drug reactions, but may progress to systemic anaphylaxis. Reaction can be immediate or delayed for days after the start of treatment. Skin disease ranges from small papules to large annular (urticarial) plaques,9 often with pruritus. Individual lesions typically last less than 24 hours, but may reappear. When the drug is discontinued, the lesions resolve rapidly.2 In angioedema, the mucous membranes of the oropharynx and orbits are congested (Figure 2); if severe, breathing and swallowing may be impaired.11 Urticaria and angioedema that are IgE mediated are frequently caused by antibiotics, especially penicillin, radiographic contrast media, and anesthetics. In contrast, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, NSAIDS, opiates, and curare can produce urticaria and angioedema that are not IgE mediated.5

Cutaneous vasculitis typically begins as erythematous macules and papules on dependent areas, such as the lower extremities, which become tender and purpuric.
Figure 3

Vasculitis
Vasculitis can be caused by an adverse drug reaction that affects the skin and other organs. Cutaneous vasculitis typically begins as erythematous macules and papules on dependent areas, such as the lower extremities or back/buttocks or supine patients (Figure 3), which become tender and purpuric. Bullae and necrosis can occur. Affected patients often have fever, myalgias, arthralgias, and fatigue. Histologic changes include fibrinoid necrosis of small blood vessels and infiltration of leukocytes with disintegrating nuclei (leukocytoclastic vasculitis). Immunoglobulins within vessel walls suggest that vasculitis is an immune complex disease, but the exact mechanism is unknown. Common culprits for drug-induced vasculitis include allopurinol, cimetidine, furosemide, penicillins, sulfonamides, hydantoins, and thiazide diuretics.9,11

This single hyperpigmented eczematous plaque is indicative of a fixed drug eruption.
Figure 4

Fixed Drug Eruption
Fixed drug eruption is an uncommon occurrence characterized by a single or several erythematous, eczematous, or bullous plaques (Figure 4). Pruritus is rare, but burning and discomfort are possible. The face and genitalia are common sites of involvement. By definition, fixed drug reactions recur in the same location with repeated drug administration. The mechanism of action is unknown. Commonly implicated drugs are penicillins, tetracycline, sulfonamides, barbiturates, phenolphthalein, and gold salts.8,9 When the reaction resolves, it is followed by postinflammatory
hyperpigmentation.

Erythema multiforme is distinguished by targetoid macules, papules, and vesicles, and sometimes involves the oral mucosa.
Figure 5

Erythema Multiforme and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome
Erythema multiforme is a hypersensitivity reaction characterized by macules, papules, and vesicles on the extremities and trunk, which often appear in a targetoid (iris) configuration (Figures 5 and 6). Fever usually accompanies the reaction. The most common cause of erythema multiforme is infection, followed by drug sensitivity. Herpes simplex virus is most frequently the infective organism, but mycoplasma may also be responsible.

Close-up view of a targetoid papule in a patient with erythema multiforme.
Figure 6

Erythema multiforme may evolve to the more serious Stevens-Johnson syndrome, an extensive blistering disease involving two or more mucous membranes.1 The disease can be life-threatening, with 5% mortality. Unlike erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome is usually drug induced. Signs and symptoms generally appear within 1 to 3 weeks of drug initiation.5 Incriminating drugs for both erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome include sulfonamides; aromatic anticonvulsants, such as phenobarbital, phenytoin, and carbamazepine; penicillins; quinolone; cephalosporins; NSAIDS; and allopurinol.11

Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis
Toxic epidermal necrolysis is a severe life-threatening drug reaction that affects the skin and mucous membranes; it is characterized by confluent bullae and sheet-like epidermal shedding (Figure 7). Fever and pain are common. Disease spreads quickly (within 2 to 3 days), and mortality can approach 30%. Infection is the leading cause of death. Nikolsky's sign, defined as epidermal detachment by lateral pressure, is positive over involved areas. Affected patients experience impaired thermoregulation and electrolyte imbalance. Reepithelialization occurs with scarring and pigmentation. Some patients have ocular sequelae, usually persistent dryness, photophobia, visual impairment, and even blindness. Histologically, epidermal necrosis occurs, while the dermis remains relatively unaffected. The etiologic agents for toxic epidermal necrolysis are the same as those for erythema multiforme and Stevens-Johnson syndrome.11

Sheet-like epidermal shedding is representative of toxic epidermal necrolysis.
Figure 7

Anticoagulant Skin Necrosis
Warfarin and heparin can induce skin necrosis, a rare sequelae of anticoagulation. Warfarin necrosis occurs in 1 in 10,000 patients. It most commonly affects obese women, who develop painful red plaques on the breasts, hips, and buttocks 3 to 5 days after therapy initiation. Hemorrhagic bullae and necrosis follow and may require surgical debridement. Individuals with protein C deficiency are at high risk for such skin necrosis because warfarin depresses this natural anticoagulant and induces a transient hypercoagulable state. Prompt recognition and treatment of warfarin necrosis can minimize fatalities.5

Heparin necrosis is typically a localized reaction at injection sites and usually appears as purpuric plaques (Figure 8) Necrosis is triggered by thrombosis via platelet aggregation and the formation of fibrin thrombi. Thrombocytopenia is common, but fibrinogen and fibrin split products are normal. The reaction is probably immune mediated.5

Heparin necrosis is typically a localized reaction at injection sites and usually appears as purpuric plaques.
Figure 8

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Systemic lupus erythematosus syndrome most frequently occurs with hydralazine and procainamide use but may also occur with isoniazid, chlorpromazine, penicillamine, phenytoin, and sulfasalazine. The syndrome consists of constitutional symptoms (malaise, myalgias, arthralgias), fever, and erythematous plaques on the face. Affected patients have antinuclear antibodies that react only with histones; anti-DNA antibodies remain negative and complement levels are normal. Other laboratory findings include elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate, anemia, and leukopenia. Patients who have slow acetyltransferase activity are more likely to develop the syndrome.9

Contact Dermatitis
Allergic contact dermatitis is the most common delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction. Skin disease follows topical application of an allergen. The disease is characterized by erythematous, papular, urticarial, or vesicular plaques (Figure 9). Pruritus is common. If chronic, lichenification and thickening of the skin ensue. Sensitization occurs within 5 to 7 days, but the dermatitis recurs within 24 hours with reapplication of the allergen. Crossreactivity with structurally related substances is common.

Eczematous plaques typical of allergic contact dermatitis developed in a patient after surgical application of povidone iodine (Betadine).
Figure 9

Any topical agent can induce a contact dermatitis, but the most common agents include neomycin sulfate, benzocaine, paraben, ethylenediamine, formaldehyde, para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), and topical antihistamines. Although rare, allergic contact dermatitis can develop after application of topical corticosteroids and should be suspected if symptoms worsen during use of these preparations.2 Patch testing is a diagnostic tool used to identify the sensitizing agent.

Photodermatitis
Photosensitive dermatitis is the interaction between a drug or its metabolite and ultraviolet radiation. The reaction can be phototoxic or photoallergic.9 Disease begins after exposure to light, usually ultraviolet A (UVA) light.11

Phototoxic reactions resemble sunburn and are dose related. The drug probably absorbs and concentrates ultraviolet radiation in the skin. Phototoxicity can occur with use of coal tar derivatives, psoralen, chlorpromazine, tetracycline, and doxycycline. Reactions resolve when either ultraviolet radiation or the drug is discontinued.

Photoallergic reactions are rare and vary from erythematous and eczematous plaques to bullae on sun-exposed skin. They appear within 1 to 3 weeks of treatment with a drug such as promethazine, PABA, NSAIDS, sulfonamides, griseofulvin, or psoralen.9 The exact mechanism is unknown, but may be a form of delayed-type hypersensitivity. In contrast to phototoxic reactions, photoallergic reactions can persist after discontinuation of medication.8

Pigmentary Changes
Various drug mechanisms can induce pigmentary changes in the skin. Some drugs, such as oral contraceptives, stimulate melanocytic activity. Others, including phenothiazines and heavy metals such as silver, mercury, and gold, become lodged within the skin and alter pigmentation directly. Antimalarials produce a slate gray or yellow pigmentation, whereas clofazimine produces a characteristic red color. Tetracycline can permanently stain teeth if taken during early childhood or pregnancy;8 minocycline can produce a blue discoloration on mucosa, within scars, and on the shins. Amiodarone produces a characteristic slate blue discoloration in sun-exposed areas.

DIAGNOSIS

Accurate diagnosis of drug eruptions can be challenging. Clinical evaluation should include history and physical examination, with an attempt to distinguish drug eruptions from viral exanthems or preexisting skin disease. Sequence of events can help to differentiate the type of reaction. For example, urticaria and angioedema occur immediately after drug exposure in contrast to most other reactions. Any new dermatitis in a patient without prior skin disease should prompt consideration of drug sensitivity. The diagnosis can be straightforward when a patient who takes few or no medications develops a rash after starting a new drug. The challenge arises when a patient takes many medications, including a few new ones, any one of which can cause an adverse reaction.

To evaluate a patient's drug sensitivity, the clinician needs to be aware of a drug's potential to produce an adverse reaction, especially a drug's frequency and pattern (morphology) of reactions.8 Evaluation should begin with a drug history, including identification of all drugs the patient has taken or received in the recent past. The clinician also needs to understand that adverse reactions can occur as late as 2 weeks after a medication has been discontinued.2 Knowledge of prior allergies helps to identify any cross reactivity to current medications. For example, a patient with a penicillin allergy may develop an adverse reaction to other beta-lactam antibiotics. Once the suspected drug (or drugs) has been identified, discontinuation of the drug is warranted. If possible, all suspected drugs should be discontinued.

Several diagnostic tests can help to identify a suspected drug allergy; however, most have limited usefulness because many allergic reactions result from drug metabolites, which cannot be detected.1 Nonspecific hypersensitivity tests include a blood eosinophil count and measurement of the IgE level. For immediate-type reactions, determining the tryptase level may be helpful because tryptase is a marker of mast cell degranulation. Immediate-type IgE reactions can be identified through skin testing, eg, the radioallergosorbent test; however, only a few drugs can be tested this way. Those drugs include penicillin, cephalosporin, muscle relaxants, thiopentone, streptokinase, cisplatin, insulin, and latex. Skin prick testing is a helpful test for penicillin allergy.12 Assays to detect drug-specific IgG and IgM antibodies are also available.8 If medication toxicity is suspected, drug levels are essential.

Skin biopsy can be a helpful diagnostic test for identifying a drug eruption. The presence of eosinophils, edema, and inflammation all suggest hypersensitivity. Vasculitis and necrotic changes may suggest erythema multiforme, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, or toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Patch testing is an important tool to evaluate the possibility of allergic contact dermatitis. As a test for reactivity, the application of specific allergens to the patient's skin for 48 to 72 hours may identify an allergen to be avoided. Photopatch testing helps to evaluate photoallergic reactions; the approach is similar to standard patch testing except that the patient is exposed to both the drug and ultraviolet light.

Perhaps the most sensitive and specific diagnostic test for drug eruptions is the rechallenge. Whereas allergic drug reactions by definition should recur, nonallergic reactions may not. In fact, with some adjustments, such as elimination of drug-drug interactions or changing the dose to accommodate impaired metabolism, many drugs can be safely readministered. Obviously, drugs suspected to have caused severe reactions should never be given again.

THERAPY

Treatment of drug eruptions is generally supportive. Symptomatic treatment primarily is predicated on the discontinuation of the offending agent, if possible. Antihistamines help to relieve pruritus and the signs and symptoms of urticaria and angioedema. Topical and systemic corticosteroids can provide additional relief. Topical corticosteroids are most beneficial for eczematous disease, but provide little benefit in urticaria. Life-threatening reactions such as angioedema and anaphylaxis require prompt treatment with epinephrine, antihistamines, and/or systemic corticosteroids.11 The treatment of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis includes fluid replacement, pain control, and often antibiotics to prevent secondary infection. The role of systemic corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, and plasmapheresis in these conditions is controversial.11 With parenteral vitamin K therapy, warfarin necrosis can be reversed, and systemic anticoagulation can be resumed using heparin. Treatment with monoclonal protein C concentrate is also helpful. Since the mechanisms of heparin and warfarin-induced necrosis are different, treatment with antiplatelet agents or warfarin can be helpful in heparin-induced necrosis.5

If a patient requires a medication that previously produced a non-life threatening drug reaction, premedicating each dose with systemic corticosteroids and antihistamines can significantly reduce the severity of the reaction. This approach is often used for patients who receive radiocontrast media.2 Desensitization is a reasonable approach for patients with an allergy to penicillins, cephalosporins, or sulfonamides.1

OUTCOMES

Most drug eruptions are benign, but a small percentage can be life threatening, including angioedema, vasculitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis, and anticoagulant necrosis. Therefore, prompt diagnosis and treatment as well as future avoidance of the medication are essential to reduce morbidity and mortality. If a medication is necessary, careful monitoring for severe reactions is important. The main caveat is that any medication has the potential to produce an adverse reaction, and any reaction has the potential to be life threatening.

NATIONAL GUIDELINES

The American Academy of Dermatology has developed guidelines of care for cutaneous adverse drug reactions.13 Five issues to consider in a drug eruption are 1) assessment of the eruption; 2) probability of a relation between the eruption and the drug; 3) potential seriousness of the eruption; 4) management; and 5) prevention of recurrence. As detailed above, diagnostic criteria include clinical (patient history and physical) and laboratory (pathology, blood work, and allergy testing) data. Once accurately diagnosed, treatment varies depending on the eruption. Discontinuance of the drug and symptomatic treatment are frequently sufficient. Educating the patient about which drugs to avoid can help prevent future eruptions.

Return to Medicine Index

REFERENCES
  1. Anderson JA, Adkinson NF Jr. Allergic reactions to drugs and biologic agents. JAMA. 1987;258:2891-2899.

  2. deShazo RD, Kemp SF. Allergic reactions to drugs and biologic agents. JAMA. 1997;278:1895-1906.

  3. Gruchalla R. Understanding drug allergies. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000;105:S637-644.

  4. Lazarou J, Pomeranz BH, Corey PN. Incidence of adverse drug reactions in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis of prospective studies. JAMA. 1998;279:1200-1205.

  5. Roujeau JC, Stern RS. Severe adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1272-1285.

  6. Ajayi FO, Sun H, Perry J. Adverse drug reactions: a review of relevant factors. J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;40:1093-1101.

  7. Meyer UA. Pharmacogenetics and adverse drug reactions. Lancet. 2000;356:1667-1671.

  8. Wintroub BU, Stern R. Cutaneous drug reactions: pathogenesis and clinical classification. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1985;13:167-179.

  9. VanArsdel PP Jr. Allergy and adverse drug reactions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1982;6:833-845.

  10. Merk HF, Hertl M. Immunologic mechanisms of cutaneous drug reactions. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 1996;15:228-235.

  11. Wolkenstein P, Revuz J. Allergic emergencies encountered by the dermatologist. Severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 1999;17:497-511.

  12. Mitchell T. Allergic drug reactions. Practitioner. 1999;243:810-15.

  13. Drake LA, Dinehart SM, Farmer ER, et al. Guidelines of care for cutaneous adverse drug reactions. American Academy of Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:458-461.

Disclaimer