Cleveland Clinic

View the Disease Management Project
Table of Contents

Published August 29, 2005

Karin B.
Cesario, MD

Department of
Gastroenterology
and Hepatology

William D.
Carey, MD

William D. Carey, MD

Department of
Gastroenterology
and Hepatology

Copyright 2005
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

  Cirrhosis is the late result of any disease that causes scarring of the liver. Patients with cirrhosis are susceptible to a variety of complications that include hepatic encephalopathy, ascites and portal hypertensive bleeding. Quality of life and survival are improved by the prevention and treatment of these complications. This chapter will review the general principles in the diagnosis and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. (See separate Disease Management chapters for overviews of cirrhotic ascites and portal hypertensive bleeding).

 

Chapter Outline

Definition

Prevalence

Pathophysiology

Signs and
Symptoms

Diagnosis

Treatment

Outcomes

References

National Guidelines

Practice Parameters Committee
of the American College of Gastroenterology
Hepatic encephalopathy


DEFINITION

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE), also known as portosystemic encephalopathy or PSE, is defined as mental or neuromotor dysfunction in a patient with acute or chronic liver disease. Several forms of HE have been described (Table 1).1 The acute form of HE is often associated with fulminant hepatic failure and may rapidly progress to seizures, coma, decerebrate posturing and death. In patients with cirrhosis, acute encephalopathy is most commonly associated with a precipitating factor such as electrolyte disturbance, medications, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, or infection. Recurrent HE may occur with or without a precipitating factor and is usually easily reversible. Persistent HE is rare, and is defined as the persistence of neuropsychiatric symptoms despite aggressive medical and dietary therapy. The most frequent form of HE is not always clinically apparent: a patient with subclinical HE has only mild cognitive deficits or subtle personality changes. Specific neuropsychological or neurophysiologic testing is required to secure the diagnosis.2

Table 1:
Clinical Characteristics of Various
Forms of Hepatic Encephalopathy
 
Precipitating
Factors
Clinical
Course
Reversibility
Acute
+
Short*
+/-*
Recurrent
+/-
Short
+
Persistent
-
Continuous
-
Subclinical
-
Insidious
-
*May be lethal or irreversible, as in fulminant hepatic failure
PREVALENCE
By definition, all patients with fulminant hepatic failure have some degree of hepatic encephalopathy. Because there is no definitive test for HE, the prevalence in other patients is difficult to describe. Clinical findings may be apparent in as many as one third of cirrhotic patients; if rigorously tested, up to two thirds have some degree of mild or subclinical HE.3
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
HE remains a complex clinical problem, the precise mechanism of which is unknown. The premise of most pathophysiologic theories is that ammonia accumulates in the central nervous system producing alterations of neurotransmission that affect consciousness and behavior. These "ammonia toxicity" theories have been supported by studies demonstrating increased ammonia levels in patients with both fulminant hepatic failure and chronic liver disease. The lack of strong correlation between serum ammonia levels and stage or degree of encephalopathy has been used in the argument that hyperammonemia may not be the sole factor in HE pathogenesis.

Most ammonia is produced in the intestine by both colonic breakdown of nitrogenous compounds and enterocytic catabolism of amino acids. Other sources of ammonia are the kidneys and skeletal muscle. Normally ammonia is metabolized in the liver (by its conversion to urea) and is excreted through the kidneys or colon. Another means of detoxifying ammonia is through the formation of glutamine from glutamate in the liver and brain. Impaired liver function, the shunting of blood around the liver and increased muscle wasting all lead to increased serum ammonia levels in cirrhotic patients.4

Ammonia interferes with brain function at many sites. Ammonia crosses the blood-brain barrier and directly depresses central nervous system functioning by inhibiting postsynaptic potentials.5 There is also evidence that hyperammonemia may facilitate the brain's uptake of tryptophan, a substance with neuroactive metabolites such as serotonin.6 Excess ammonia may reduce levels of brain adenosine triphosphate resulting in impaired cerebral energy.7 Lastly, the metabolism of ammonia to glutamine in the brain increases the intracellular osmolarity of astrocytes, inducing both astrocyte swelling and vasodilation.8 Increased astrocyte hydration without overt increased intracranial pressure is currently considered a major factor in the development of HE in patients with chronic liver disease.9

Toxins other than ammonia have also been implicated in the pathogenesis of HE. Excesses of neurotoxic short-chain fatty acids and mercaptans have received attention in the past.10 Patients with cirrhosis have also been shown to have decreased branched-chain amino acid-to-aromatic amino acid ratios. It has been postulated that the increased aromatic amino acid in the cirrhotic patient's brain may competitively inhibit normal neurotransmitters such as dopamine and norepinephrine.11,12 Cirrhotic patients with HE have greatly increased serum manganese levels. Manganese may deposit directly in the basal ganglia and induce extrapyramidal symptoms.13 Manganese may also act synergistically with ammonia to activate peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptors and the GABA-ergic neuroinhibitory system.14

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS
In patients with progressive HE, there is a gradual decrease in level of consciousness, intellectual capacity, and logical behavior along with development of specific neurologic deficits. Two staging systems have been described. (1) Numerous studies have employed the West Haven criteria of altered mental status in patients with HE (Table 2).1 (2) Although the Glasgow Coma Scale has not been rigorously evaluated in this specific patient population, its widespread use in various other disorders of brain function makes it applicable in patients with acute or chronic liver disease (Table 3).4
DIAGNOSIS

HE is a diagnosis of exclusion. Similar neuropsychiatric symptoms are seen in a variety of metabolic disorders, toxic ingestions, or intracranial processes (Table 4). In certain patients, brain imaging or electroencephalography may be indicated to exclude an intracranial abnormality. Lumbar puncture with cerebrospinal fluid analysis may also be required in patients with unexplained fever, leukocytosis, or symptoms suggestive of meningeal irritation. Knowledge of the existence of acute or chronic liver disease and/or the history of HE are often helpful in heightening clinical suspicion and/or securing the diagnosis.1

Table 4:
Differential Diagnostic
Considerations In Hepatic Encephalopathy
Metabolic
Toxic
CNS
Hypo- or hyperglycemia Alcohol
intoxication
Bleed or
infarction
Hypo- or hypercalcemia Alcohol
withdrawal
Abscess/
meningitis
Hypokalemia Carbon monoxide narcosis Encephalitis
Hypoxia Illicit drugs Trauma
Uremia Medications Tumor
 

The most commonly used laboratory test in HE is the venous ammonia level. Because of inconsistent elevation and lack of correlation with the stage of encephalopathy, the ammonia level is not considered a good screening tool.15 Measurement of serum ammonia can be helpful when, for example, the level is elevated and there is doubt regarding the presence of significant liver disease. The arterial ammonia concentration provides a more accurate assessment of the amount of ammonia at the blood-brain barrier, but is also of limited clinical utility.

Because of implications for diagnosis and treatment, a precipitating factor should be sought in all cirrhotic patients hospitalized for HE (Table 5).4 Serum determination of the complete blood cell count, electrolyte levels, and renal function is indicated in almost all cases. Recent use of psychoactive medications, such as narcotics or sedatives, should also be investigated. In a confused patient who cannot give a reliable history, the examination of stool or placement of a nasogastric tube may be of help in detecting gastrointestinal bleeding. Since infection is a common precipitating factor in HE, the culture of body fluids (urine, blood and ascites, if present) should be routinely performed. Lastly, constipation and the consumption of excessive dietary protein can precipitate HE. This is thought to be due to the increased nitrogen load in the gastrointestinal tract. Rare precipitants, such as hepatoma or vascular occlusion, need be investigated only if no other factors are thought to be contributing, or with clinical suspicion.

Table 5:
Precipitating Factors In Hepatic Encephalopathy
  • Anemia
  • Azotemia/uremia
  • Constipation
  • Dehydration
  • Excessive dietary protein
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding
  • Hepatoma
  • Hypokalemia, metabolic alkalosis
  • Hypoglycemia
  • Hypothyroidism
  • Hypoxia
  • Infection (urinary tract, ascites, etc.)
  • Medications (narcotics, sedatives, etc.)
  • Vascular occlusion
TREATMENT
The main objectives in the treatment of HE are fourfold: (1) provide supportive care, (2) correct any precipitating factors, (3) reduce the nitrogen load in the gastrointestinal tract, and (4) assess the need for long-term therapy.1 Each of these objectives will be discussed separately here.

Standard supportive care is required for all hospitalized patients with HE. Patient safety and frequent monitoring of mental status is crucial. This may require additional personnel. In the case of comatose patients, admission to the intensive care unit and/or endotracheal intubation may be necessary. Patients with HE should also avoid prolonged periods of fasting. Although the restriction of dietary protein at the time of acute HE is often a cornerstone of therapy, protracted nitrogen restriction can lead to malnutrition. Therefore, appropriate enteral nutrition, either by mouth or nasogastric feeding tube, should be administered as soon as feasible.1

A methodical search to identify and treat any precipitating factors is crucial in reversing the signs and symptoms of HE (see Diagnosis section above).

Because the toxins thought to be responsible for HE arise in the gastrointestinal tract, removal of the nitrogenous load is the mainstay of therapy. Various pharmacologic agents may be used, but the nondigestable disaccharide known as lactulose (Enulose or Kristalose) is currently the first-line therapy.1 The exact mode of action of lactulose is uncertain, but is thought to involve both bacteriostatic and cathartic effects in the large intestine. After consumption, lactulose passes through the small bowel completely undigested. Once in the colon, lactulose is metabolized by colonic bacteria and the pH is lowered. This acidification of the bowel is thought to underlie the cathartic effect: ammonia can then pass from the bloodstream into the colonic lumen to be excreted. As a result, peripheral ammonia levels are reduced.16 Because lactulose is completely nonabsorbed, it does not alter serum glucose levels in diabetic patients, a concern of many patients and primary caregivers.

For acute encephalopathy, lactulose can be administered either orally, by mouth or through a nasogastric tube, or via retention enemas (Table 6). The usual oral dose is 45 mL followed by dosing every 1 to 2 hours until evacuation occurs. At that point, dosing is adjusted to attain two or three soft bowel movements daily. This usually requires 15 to 45 mL every 6 to 12 hours. Lactulose by enema is administered as 300 mL in 1 L of water, and should be retained for 1 hour. Due to the difficulty of administration, lactulose by enema is not generally used for chronic therapy. Common side effects include flatulence, bloating, and diarrhea. Lactitol, which is generally easier to tolerate, is used only in Europe and is not currently available in the United States.1

For patients who do not tolerate lactulose or have continued symptoms, antibiotics are a second-line alternative for therapy.1 Antibiotics are thought to reverse HE by alteration of colonic bacteria. Metronidazole (Flagyl) and neomycin sulfate (Neo-Fradin) are most commonly used. Metronidazole is generally administered at 250 mg every 8 to 12 hours (500 to 750 mg daily). Dose and duration of metronidazole should be minimized as much as possible to avoid peripheral neuropathy, a side effect associated with its long-term use. Neomycin is as effective as metronidazole and is administered at 1000 mg orally every 4 to 8 hours (3 to 6 grams daily) in acute encephalopathy and 500 to 1000 mg orally every 6 to 12 hours (1 to 2 grams daily) when used chronically. Neomycin use should also be limited, if possible, since long-term use can lead to rare ototoxicity and/or renal failure.4 If administered chronically (with or without lactulose) to control HE symptoms, periodic renal and annual auditory monitoring should be performed.1 If a patient is already receiving antibiotics for prophylaxis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis-usually norfloxacin (Noroxin) or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (Bactrim or Septra)-the use of additional antibiotics for treatment of HE is discouraged. There are currently no data to suggest that multiple antibiotics provide additional therapeutic benefit, and may contribute to the development of drug-resistant infection.

Several other HE therapies have been investigated but are not routinely used. These include use of ornithine aspartate, flumazenil (Romazicon), and bromocriptine (Parlodel). Early studies using ornithine aspartate are encouraging, but the drug is not currently available in the United States.17,18 Flumazenil may also be helpful, but is currently indicated only for patients with acute HE and suspected benzodiazepine intake.1,19 No oral or long-acting preparations are currently available which would make flumazenil very cumbersome to use long-term. Improvement of extrapyramidal symptoms has also been reported when bromocriptine was added to more conventional therapies.20 Bromocriptine at 30 mg orally twice daily can be considered in patients refractory to other therapies.1

Occasionally, a portosystemic shunt (spontaneous, surgical or from placement of a transhepatic portosystemic shunt), is thought to be the primary cause of recurrent or chronic HE. In these rare cases, the shunt can be occluded. This is generally accomplished by the placing of occlusive coils by an interventional radiologist.21 This advanced procedure should be undertaken only at experienced medical centers and after all other measures have failed.1

Before discharge from the hospital, all cirrhotic patients with HE should be assessed for the need for long-term therapy. Patients should be counseled on avoiding precipitating factors such as constipation and psychoactive medications. Compliance with chronic medications, including lactulose and/or antibiotics, should be emphasized. Prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and gastroesophageal varices should be implemented when indicated. Lastly, appropriate candidates should be referred to a liver transplantation center after the first episode of overt encephalopathy. The ultimate therapy for cirrhosis and HE is orthotopic liver transplantation.1

OUTCOMES

Some forms of HE are reversible, but the development of overt HE carries a poor prognosis. Recovery and recurrence rates vary, but without liver transplantation the 1-year survival is only 40%. Both acute and chronic HE, once advanced to stage 4 (coma), are associated with 80% overall mortality.22

Return to Medicine Index

REFERENCES
  1. Blei AT, Cordoba J; Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:1968-1976.

  2. Gitlin N. Subclinical portal-systemic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;83:8-11.

  3. Gitlin N, Lewis DC, Hinkley L. The diagnosis and prevalence of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in apparently healthy ambulant, non-shunted patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1986;3:75-82.

  4. Fitz JG (2002) Hepatic encephalopathy, hepatopulmonary syndromes, hepatorenal syndrome, coagulopathy and endocrine complications of liver disease. In: Feldman M, Friedman LS and Sleisenger MH (eds) Sleisenger and Fordtran's Gastrointestinal and Liver Disease. 7th Edition. Philadelphia: WB Saunders: 1543-1565.

  5. Raabe W. Ammonium ions abolish excitatory synaptic transmission between cerebellar neurons in primary dissociated tissue culture. J Neurophysiol. 1992;68:93-99.

  6. Grippon P, Le Poncin-Laffite M, Boschat M, et al. Evidence for the role of ammonia in the intracerebral transfer and metabolism of tryptophan. Hepatology. 1986:6:682-686.

  7. Hindfelt B, Plum F, Duffy TE. Effect of acute ammonia intoxication on cerebral metabolism in rats with portacaval shunts. J Clin Invest. 1977;59:386-396.

  8. Haussinger D, Roth E, Lang F, Gerok W. Cellular hydration state: an important determinant of protein catabolism in health and disease. Lancet. 1993;341:1330-1332.

  9. Haussinger D, Kircheis G, Fischer R, Schliess F, vom Dahl S. Hepatic encephalopathy in chronic liver disease: a clinical manifestation of astrocyte swelling and low-grade cerebral edema? J Hepatol. 2000;32:1035-1038.

  10. Zieve L, Doizaki WM, Zieve J. Synergism between mercaptans and ammonia or fatty acids in the production of coma: a possible role for mercaptans in the pathogenesis of hepatic coma. J Lab Clin Med. 1974;83:16-28.

  11. Ferenci P, Wewalka F. Plasma amino acids in hepatic encephalopathy. J Neural Transm Suppl. 1978;14(suppl):87-94.

  12. Morgan MY, Milsom JP, Sherlock S. Plasma ratio of valine, leucine and isoleucine to phenylalanine and tyrosine in liver disease. Gut. 1978;19:1068-1073.

  13. Rose C, Butterworth RF, Zayed J, et al. Manganese deposition in basal ganglia structures results from both portal-systemic shunting and liver dysfunction. Gastroenterology. 1999;117:640-644.

  14. Jones EA, Basile AS. Does ammonia contribute to increased GABA-ergic neurotransmission in liver failure? Metab Brain Dis. 1998;13:351-360.

  15. Stahl J. Studies of the blood ammonia in liver disease. Its diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic significance. Ann Intern Med. 1963;58:1-24.

  16. Cordoba J, Blei AT. Treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:1429-1439.

  17. Kircheis G, Nilius R, Held C, et al. Therapeutic efficacy of L-ornithine-L aspartate infusions in patients with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy: results of a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Hepatology. 1997;25:1351-1360.

  18. Stauch S, Kircheis G, Adler G, et al. Oral L-ornithine-L-aspartate therapy of chronic hepatic encephalopathy: results of a placebo-controlled double-blind study. J Hepatol. 1998;28:856-864.

  19. Barbaro G, Di Lorenzo G, Soldini M, et al. Flumazenil for hepatic encephalopathy grade III and IVa in patients with cirrhosis: an Italian multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study. Hepatology. 1998;28:374-378.

  20. Uribe M, Farca A, Marquez MA, Garcia-Ramos G, Guevara L. Treatment of chronic portal systemic encephalopathy with bromocriptine: a double-blind controlled trial. Gastroenterology. 1979;76:1347-1351.

  21. Sakurabayashi S, Sezai S, Yamamoto Y, Hirano M, Oka H. Embolization of portal-systemic shunts in cirrhotic patients with chronic recurrent hepatic encephalopathy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1997;20:120-124.

  22. Bustamante J, Rimola A, Ventura PJ, et al. Prognostic significance of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 1999:30:890-895.

Disclaimer