Screening
for Liver Cancer
|
KEY
POINTS
- Serum
alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels are elevated in many patients
with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, AFP measurement
is not an ideal test because it lacks both sensitivity
and specificity.
- Real-time
ultrasonography is the most cost-effective modality for
evaluating patients with HCC.
- Modifications
in computed tomography have increased its sensitivity
in patients with HCC from 50% or 60% to more than 90%.
- In
North America, screening for HCC in patients with HCV
infection is widely accepted by hepatologists, even though
clearer demonstration of effectiveness is not currently
available. In general, patients are screened by AFP measurements
and ultrasonography every 6 to 12 months.
|
Hepatocellular
carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth-leading cause of cancer in men worldwide
and the ninth-leading cause in women. It is the most common primary
tumor of the liver and is responsible for 1 million deaths per year.182 183
Its incidence is rising in both the Western world and Japan, and increases
in the incidence of HCV-associated HCC have been reported in the United
States, Italy, and Japan.
El-Serag184
and El-Serag and Mason185
reported that the number of cases of HCV-induced cirrhosis that
led to the development of HCC in the United States doubled between
1979 and 1998. Moreover, they may have underestimated the incidence
because they studied only biopsy-proven cases of HCV. Similar increases
have been seen in Western Europe and especially in Japan. The higher
incidence in Japan appears to be associated with an increase in
the number of blood transfusions and the use of contaminated needles
during and shortly after World War II, which led to the development
of hepatitis C-induced chronic liver disease many years later.186 187
The presence
of chronic HCV infection leading to cirrhosis is the necessary precursor
in the natural history of HCC. Several series from the United States,
Italy, Japan, and France reported annual rates that ranged from
1.2% to 6.9%, although cirrhosis appears to have been the common
denominator in most of these cases.188
There are rare reports of HCC presenting in hepatitis C patients
in the absence of cirrhosis.189
|
SCREENING
AND SURVEILLANCE |
Screening for HCC
in North America remains controversial. The U.S. Preventive Services
Task Force, for example, does not endorse screening for this disorder.
The cumulative costs of testing and evaluation of false positives,
combined with the unproven value of detection of early HCC, explain
this controversy. The availability of liver transplantation for patients
with limited HCC is an additional factor to consider.
Improvements
in survival and cost-effectiveness have not been demonstrated in
randomized controlled trials of screening in patients with HCV-induced
HCC. It is well known that screening low-incidence populations provides
minimal benefit. Screening for HCC in patients with HCV infection
is widely accepted by hepatologists, even though there is no evidence
that it is effective. In general, patients are screened by alpha-fetoprotein
(AFP) measurements and ultrasonography every 6 months. This interval
was chosen on the basis of tumor-volume doubling time, which ranges
from 1 to 20 months (median, 6).190
Sherman outlined
in great detail the components of a good surveillance program (Table
13).191 These
may be applicable to patients with HCV infection, considering its
potential to progress to HCC.
| Table
13 |
Characteristics
of a successful
surveillance program191 |
- The
disease must be common and must cause substantial morbidity
and mortality.
- The
target population must be easily identifiable.
- The
surveillance test must carry low morbidity and high sensitivity
and specificity.
- Recall
policies must be standardized.
- The
surveillance test must be acceptable to the target population.
- There
must be effective therapy.
- Surveillance
should reduce mortality from the disease.
|
A recent search
of the literature found only one randomized prospective cohort study
of screening tests for HCC in patients with chronic HCV infection.192
In it, Gebo et al found that twice-yearly screening by AFP measurements
and ultrasonography can detect tumors smaller than 3 cm. Small tumors,
of course, facilitate resection or transplantation.
The recommendation
of this advisory board, while consistent with much published literature,
will undergo revision as better data become available.
Screening and
surveillance for HCC and underlying cirrhosis begins with the recognition
that the patient has advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis.193 Predisposing factors for the progression of cirrhosis to HCC should
be clearly identified by the clinician. Among these factors are
age at acquisition of HCV infection, excessive alcohol consumption
(>50 g/d), and coinfection with HBV194
or HIV.195
The diagnosis
of HCC in the Western world usually occurs 3 to 4 decades after
the initial acquisition of HCV. The diagnosis is usually based on
clinical deterioration, laboratory test results, and radiographic
and histologic findings. Clinical manifestations of HCC are sometimes
characterized by anorexia, increasing fatigue, weakness, weight
loss, abdominal pain, occasional hemoperitoneum, and variceal bleeding.
Physical examination may demonstrate significant ascites and an
abdominal mass with a prominent bruit.
The most common
laboratory test for HCC is measurement of the serum AFP level, which
is elevated in many patients with HCC. However, the AFP measurement
is not an ideal test because it lacks both sensitivity and specificity.
There appears to be no correlation between the AFP level and the size
or extent of the intrahepatic disease or the presence of metastases.
Patients with well-differentiated HCC and anaplastic lesions tend
to have normal AFP levels and small lesions (<2 cm).196
The presence of a mass lesion in the liver in a patient with cirrhosis
and an AFP level greater than 200 ng/mL is considered diagnostic of
HCC.197 Fluctuating
AFP levels may be present in patients who have underlying chronic
active hepatitis and active cirrhosis. A rise in AFP levels is sometimes
problematic for patients with negative imaging studies. These patients
should be followed very closely with periodic imaging studies, such
as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and triple-phase computed tomography
(CT).
In addition,
there are investigational tests such as measurements of AFP L-3,
serum des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin, and prothrombin induced by vitamin
K absence II (PIVKA); these levels are elevated in patients with
HCC and are more specific. However, recent reports from the United
States and Japan suggest increased sensitivity and specificity in
patients with liver tumors smaller than 3 cm on PIVKA testing. Cirrhotic
patients who present with hypoglycemia, hypercalcemia, hypercholesterolemia,
and erythrocytosis should be thoroughly evaluated for the presence
of HCC.
The following imaging
studies are commonly used in establishing the diagnosis of HCC.
Ultrasonography.
Real-time ultrasonography is the most cost-effective modality for
evaluating patients with HCC. In the Far East, this modality is
commonly used for detecting tumors smaller than 3 cm; in such cases,
its sensitivity ranges from 50% to 90%. Doppler ultrasound can be
used as an adjunct to real-time ultrasonography, and it can demonstrate
the vascularity of the tumor and the patency of the portal and hepatic
veins. Power Doppler, a further improvement in technology, can demonstrate
the vascular nature of the tumor to a higher degree than can routine
Doppler. The drawbacks of ultrasonography are that isodense lesions
cannot be visualized and hyperechoic lesions cannot be differentiated
from HCC. In addition, tumors smaller than 1 cm cannot be adequately
differentiated from benign tumors and hepatic nodules.198-200
CT.
Improvements in technology have led to modifications in CT scanning,
which have increased its sensitivity in patients with HCC from 50%
or 60% to more than 90%. Helical CT allows the radiologist to scan
patients during their arterial and portal venous phases. Because
most HCCs derive their blood supply from the hepatic artery, helical
CT can demonstrate HCC in more than 90% of cases when all three
aspects of the CT scanning procedure (ie, nonenhanced, arterial
phase, and portal venous phase) are utilized.200 201
MRI.
MRIs in patients with HCC demonstrate a high-intensity pattern on
T2-weighted imaging. Dynamic MRI, following an intravenous
bolus injection of gadolinium diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid
(Gd-DTPA), reveals a high intensity in the early arterial dominant
phase and better contrast resolution.
Magnetic resonance
angiography. Magnetic resonance angiography demonstrates intrahepatic
vascularity as well as vascularity in the inferior vena cava. This
technology is advantageous during the staging of HCC. Hepatic angiography,
once the gold standard for the radiologic diagnosis of HCC, is now
used primarily for the delivery of chemotherapy and chemoembolization.
However, in Western Europe and occasionally in some centers in the
United States, lipiodol, an iodized oil, is injected into the hepatic
artery, and 2 weeks later a CT scan of the liver will demonstrate
the accumulation of lipiodol within the HCC.202
This modality can also be used in patients with a rising AFP level
and no demonstrable lesion on CT or as a staging procedure prior
to surgery or liver transplantation.
Patients with
HCV infection and cirrhosis may be screened for HCC by imaging and
measurement of the AFP level, although HCC can develop in patients
with a persistently normal AFP. The screening process is accelerated
in patients with tumors smaller than 1 cm and in patients who experience
a progressive increase in AFP levels in the absence of a mass lesion.
|
SCREENING
AND PRIMARY CARE |
At their current
numbers, gastroenterologists, hepatologists, and infectious disease
specialists might be overwhelmed by the effort required to participate
in screening programs, one of the hallmarks of which is an efficient
recall system. Therefore, additional training to teach primary care
physicians how to adopt a screening program for patients with HCV-induced
cirrhosis may be a more practical idea. |