Cleveland Clinic

View the Disease Management Project
Table of Contents

Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Revised
February 7, 2005

Mikkael A.
Sekeres, MD, MS

Mikkael A. Sekeres, MD, MS

Department of
Hematology and
Medical Oncology

Print Chapter

Copyright 2002
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation

 
DEFINITION

 

Chapter Outline

Definition

Epidemiology

Pathophysiology

Signs and
Symptoms

Diagnosis

Therapy

Outcomes

References

 

Historically, the myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have been referred to as oligoblastic leukemia, refractory anemia, smoldering acute leukemia, or preleukemia.1 They represent a heterogeneous hematopoietic disorder derived from an abnormal multipotent progenitor cell, and are characterized by a hyperproliferative bone marrow, dysplasia of the cellular elements, and ineffective hematopoiesis.2 MDS can be indolent or aggressive, depending on the subclassification (discussed below). Recognition of this entity has increased over the past decade, and should be suspected in older adults with anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, or a combination of these abnormalities. Not surprisingly, morbidity and mortality result from anemia, bleeding, and infection, along with transformation to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), which occurs in approximately one third of patients.3-5 MDS can be cured with bone marrow transplantation, a procedure prohibitively toxic in older patients with this diagnosis, and estimated to be available for only 5-10% of MDS patients. Thus, most treatments focus on alleviation of symptoms, reduction in transfusion requirements, and improvement of quality of life.

EPIDEMIOLOGY

MDS is a disease of older adults, with >80% of patients over the age of 60 years. A precise incidence of new diagnoses has been difficult to define in the setting of changing classification systems and difficulty in establishing the diagnosis. In general, MDS affects between 12,000 and 20,000 people in the United States each year, or 22 to 45 per 100,000 people over the age of 70 years.6 The population prevalence is estimated to be between 30,000 and 40,000 people in the U.S., with a majority of people having indolent (early) MDS (generally defined as having fewer than 5% myeloblasts in the bone marrow). These numbers make it as prevalent as other common hematologic malignancies of older adults, such as multiple myeloma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia.7

Risk factors for developing MDS include:

  • Age. Population studies in England have found that the crude incidence increases from 0.5 per 100,000 people under age 50 years to 89 per 100,000 people 80 years of age or older.8
  • Genetic predisposition. Familial syndromes have been reported, but are rare.9
  • Environmental exposures. Particularly with benzene and possibly other industrial solvents.10
  • Prior therapy. Including radiation treatment, alkylating agents (ie, chlorambucil, cyclophosphamide, melphalan), and other chemotherapy agents (on a case report level).11 For alkylating agents, the risk of developing a secondary MDS or AML starts with the end of therapy and peaks at 4 years, with a plateau at 10 years.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

In MDS, the hematopoietic stem cells that define the disease are clonally derived. In broad strokes, MDS can be divided into two major subtypes: indolent (or early) MDS, in which pro-apoptotic forces predominate, and aggressive (or advanced) MDS, in which pro-proliferative factors are more common. In the indolent categories of MDS, inhibitory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß), interferon-γ, and Fas ligand promote apoptosis.12 As genetic lesions accumulate, indolent MDS becomes proliferative MDS, and eventually AML. This occurs as oncogenes are activated and tumor suppressor genes inactivated. In the proliferative categories, ras, FMS, and p53 mutations are more common than inhibitory cytokines, and are thought to facilitate the transformation to AML.13 In general, bone marrow stem cells in MDS are less responsive to and produce less of the hematopoietic growth factors, including IL-3, IL-6, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF).14 Peripheral blood cytopenias result from this process. Thus, the paradox of having a hypercellular bone marrow in patients requiring blood transfusions.

Cytogenetic abnormalities are found in 40% to 70% of primary and 80% to 90% of secondary MDS. Typically, trisomy 8 and monosomy 5 or 7 will be present. Findings of these abnormalities in patients with frank AML indicate probable evolution (which may be subclinical) from an antecedent MDS—which confers a worse prognosis. Therapy-related MDS can be associated with these same abnormalities in addition to translocations or rearrangements involving 11q23 or 21q22. Favorable abnormalities include 5q- or 20q- or normal cytogenetics, while unfavorable abnormalities are found with complex cytogenetics (three or more cytogenetic abnormalities) or chromosome 7 irregularities.15,16

SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS

MDS often presents as a refractory cytopenia in an older adult who may be entirely asymptomatic. A macrocytic or normocytic anemia is found in nearly all MDS patients, and frequently is accompanied by thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, or both. Typical symptoms reflect underlying cytopenias: patients with anemia frequently complain of fatigue, shortness of breath, loss of appetite, and even exacerbation of underlying cardiac symptoms; patients with thrombocytopenia may have spontaneous bruising, the appearance of petechiae (particularly in dependent areas, such as the shins, or in areas exposed to minor trauma, such as skin under elastic waistbands), or bleeding of mucosal surfaces (including the gums when brushing teeth); and patients with leukopenia may have recurrent infections, particularly of the skin, mucosal surfaces (especially the oral and rectal mucosa), and lungs.

MDS can be associated with paraneoplastic syndromes related to autoimmune processes.17 These may be dermatologic (psoriasis or Sweet's syndrome); rheumatologic (vasculitis); hematologic (hemolytic anemia or Glanzmann's disease [an acquired glycoprotein IIB/IIIA inhibition resulting in abnormal platelet function]); or endocrinologic (hypothyroidism, diabetes insipidus). In addition, a subset of MDS, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, which actually represents an overlap syndrome with myeloproliferative disorders, may cause splenomegaly and subsequent complaints of left upper-quadrant abdominal pain and early satiety. Cytokine release (see Pathophysiology section, above) may result in constitutional symptoms, such as anorexia, weight loss, and even low-grade fevers.

DIAGNOSIS

MDS is diagnosed through a combination of abnormal findings in the peripheral blood and bone marrow. Morphologic abnormalities should be present in at least 10% of cells in a given lineage. In the peripheral blood, erythrocytes may be macrocytic, nucleated, or stippled, whereas neutrophils may be hyposegmented, hypogranular, or bilobed with chromatin condensation (so-called pseudo-Pelger-Huet cells). In the bone marrow, erythrocyte precursors may have megaloblastoid changes, contain ringed sideroblasts, or include Howell-Jolly bodies. Myeloid maturation may be stunted, and megakaryocytes can be dysplastic.

Subtypes of MDS are defined using one of two classification systems. The French-American-British (FAB) system has been used widely since 1982 and is useful in predicting rates of survival and of transformation to AML (Table 1).18 Within the FAB, MDS is divided into refractory anemia; refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts; refractory anemia with excess blasts; refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation; and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, an "overlap syndrome" that can include features of a myelodysplastic syndrome, a myeloproliferative disorder, or both.

In 1999, the World Health Organization (WHO) published its classification of hematopoietic and lymphoid neoplasms, and in 2002 published a clarification and rationale for differences between the FAB and WHO classifications (Table 2).19,20 The most important difference was the lowering of the blast threshold for diagnosis of AML from 30% to 20% blasts in the blood or bone marrow. CMML was also formally separated from the myelodysplastic syndromes, and a cytogenetically-defined MDS subgroup, the 5q- syndrome (which confers a good prognosis, is associated with normal or elevated platelet counts, and is found in 5-10% of patients) was identified. The WHO system, which does not differ substantially from the FAB classification, is gaining wider acceptance in clinical practice and in the literature.

THERAPY

Options for treatment of MDS range from supportive care (which includes blood product transfusions and the use of growth factors) to intensive therapy with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, the only potentially curative approach to MDS, is a realistic option for only about 5-10% of patients because MDS is diagnosed most commonly in patients in their seventh or eighth decade of life.21-23 Conditioning regimens typically consist of busulfan (Myleran) and cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan), and long-term (often 2-year) disease-free survival approaches 40%, although studies often include young MDS patients (with a median age between 30 and 45 years) with earlier stages of MDS. Treatment-related mortality may be as high as 40% to 50%. Newer approaches take advantage of non-myeloablative ("mini") conditioning regimens in an effort to reduce treatment-related mortality and to include older patients with MDS. This type of transplantation is still considered experimental, but can be offered to patients up to 70 years of age who otherwise are in good health.

Less-intensive (midrange) therapeutic options for patients with indolent MDS include the use of thalidomide (Thalomid), arsenic trioxide (Trisnox), amifostine (Ethyol), or immunosuppressive therapy. Thalidomide, whose effects may be mediated through inhibition of TNF-α, TGF-ß, and a decrease in microvessel density, appears to be more effective in patients without excess myeloblasts, in whom the response rate (defined as hematologic improvement and/or improvement in blood product transfusion requirements) may be as high as 31%.24,25 Many patients are intolerant of the medication's side effects, which include gastrointestinal toxicity (particularly constipation), somnolence, and neurotoxicity. A Thalidomide derivative, lenalidomide (Revlimid) has been investigated in two large Phase II trials in patients with the 5q- syndrome and in patients with non-5q- low-grade MDS. In a Phase I/II trial, 10/12 patients with the 5q- syndrome experienced complete responses, including cytogenetic remissions.

Arsenic trioxide works through both pro-differentiation and pro-apoptotic mechanisms, and as a single agent can yield response rates (defined as improvement in hematologic parameters) of 20-25%. This drug can also be used in patients with advanced MDS. Amifostine promotes the growth of hematopoietic cells, and in a phase II study, 30% of patients achieved a single or multilineage hematologic response.26 Symptoms of fatigue and gastrointestinal toxicity were experienced at higher drug doses. Immunosuppressive therapy (which includes the use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG, Atgam) and cyclosporine A (Neoral, Sandimmune)) takes advantage of the immune-mediated aspects of MDS and may be effective in the subset of patients with hypoplastic MDS—MDS that resembles aplastic anemia, with a hypocellular bone marrow.27 Improved hematologic counts and transfusion independence may be achieved in up to 33% of appropriately treated patients.

Another midrange therapy, 5-azacytidine (5-aza, azacitidine, Vidaza), deserves mention. This hypomethylating agent induces hematopoietic progenitor cell differentiation. In a recent phase III trial, responses occurred in 60% of patients treated with 5-aza compared with 5% of patients receiving supportive care, including 23% complete or partial remissions. Median survival, transformation to AML, and even quality of life was better for patients receiving 5-aza than for those receiving supportive care.28,29 This drug is the only one approved for the treatment of MDS. Though approved for all MDS subtypes (in the Summer of 2004), it is most effective in patients with advanced MDS. A similar class of drug, decitabine, has been investigated in a multi-center phase III study.

Patients with more indolent forms of MDS (without excess myeloblasts) who may be dependent on blood product transfusions may derive some benefit from the use of growth factors. Often, G-CSF (Filgrastim) or GM-CSF (Sargramostim) is combined with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO, Procrit or Epogen). One recent study demonstrated a response rate of 48% in MDS patients with use of a combined growth factor approach.30 Typical response rates, across a number of studies, are in the 15-20% range. Growth factor agents do need to be administered over a protracted period of time to maintain the cellular response. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network, which develops disease-specific clinical practice guidelines, recommends use of combination growth factor agents in low-risk MDS patients (with serum erythropoietin levels <500 U/L) as frequently as five times per week. In our experience, patients with serum erythropoietin levels <100 U/L tend to benefit from the use of growth factors, while those with levels >500 U/L do not. Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) is not recommended for the treatment of patients with MDS outside of the setting of a clinical trial.

OUTCOMES

One of the most widely used prognostic systems for MDS patients is the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS; Table 3).31 The IPSS separates patients into four distinct subgroups based solely on the percentage of bone marrow blasts, cytogenetics, and the number of cytopenias. Patients with fewer bone marrow blasts and cytopenias and with better cytogenetics (normal, -5q, -20q, -Y) have a prolonged median survival, while those with more blasts and cytopenias and worse cytogenetics (complex or abnormalities of chromosome 7) have a shorter survival.

Return to Medicine Index

REFERENCES
  1. Cheson BD, Bennett JM, Kantarjian H, et al. Report of an international working group to standardize response criteria for myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2000;96:3671-4.

  2. Silverman L. The Myelodysplastic Syndrome. In: Holland J, Frei E, Bast R, Kufe D, Morton D, Weichselbaum R, eds. Cancer Medicine. Baltimore, Maryland: Williams and Wilkins, 1996;2593-2615.

  3. Economopoulos T, Stathakis N, Foudoulakis A, et al. Myelodysplastic syndromes: analysis of 131 cases according to the FAB classification. Eur J Haematol. 1987;38:338-44.

  4. Foucar K, Langdon RM, Armitage JO, Olson DB, Carroll TJ. Myelodysplastic syndromes. A clinical and pathologic analysis of 109 cases. Cancer. 1985;56:553-61.

  5. Kerkhofs H, Hermans J, Haak HL, Leeksma CH. Utility of the FAB classification for myelodysplastic syndromes: investigation of prognostic factors in 237 cases. Br J Haematol. 1987;65:73-81.

  6. Aul C, Gattermann N, Schneider W. Age-related incidence and other epidemiological aspects of myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 1992;82:358-67.

  7. Greenberg P. Myelodysplastic syndrome. In: Hoffman R, Benz E, Shattil S, et al., eds. Hematology: Basic Principles and Practice 3rd Edition. New York: Churchill Livingston, 2000.

  8. Williamson PJ, Kruger AR, Reynolds PJ, Hamblin TJ, Oscier DG. Establishing the incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J Haematol. 1994;87:743-5.

  9. Paul B, Reid MM, Davison EV, Abela M, Hamilton PJ. Familial myelodysplasia: progressive disease associated with emergency of monosomy 7. Br J Haematol. 1987;65:321-3.

  10. Pasqualetti P, Casale R, Colantonio D, Collacciani A. Occupational risk for hematological malignancies. Am J Hematol. 1991;38:147-9.

  11. Karp JE, Smith MA. The molecular pathogenesis of treatment-induced (secondary) leukemias: foundations for treatment and prevention. Semin Oncol. 1997;24:103-13.

  12. Allampallam K, Shetty V, Mundle S, et al. Biological significance of proliferation, apoptosis, cytokines, and monocyte/macrophage cells in bone marrow biopsies of 145 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Int J Hematol. 2002;75:289-97.

  13. Sugimoto K, Hirano N, Toyoshima H, et al. Mutations of the p53 gene in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and MDS-derived leukemia. Blood. 1993;81:3022-6.

  14. Schipperus M, Sonneveld P, Lindemans J, et al. The effects of interleukin-3, GM-CSF, and G-CSF on the growth kinetics of colony-forming cells in myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 1990;4:267-72.

  15. Mufti GJ. Chromosomal deletions in the myelodysplastic syndrome. Leuk Res. 1992;16:35-41.

  16. Fenaux P, Morel P, Lai JL. Cytogenetics of myelodysplastic syndromes. Semin Hematol. 1996;33:127-38.

  17. Billstrom R, Johansson H, Johansson B, Mitelman F. Immune-mediated complications in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes--clinical and cytogenetic features. Eur J Haematol. 1995;55:42-8.

  18. Bennett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, et al. Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 1982;51:189-99.

  19. Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, et al. The World Health Organization classification of neoplastic diseases of the hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. Report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting, Airlie House, Virginia, November, 1997. Ann Oncol. 1999;10:1419-32.

  20. Vardiman JW, Harris NL, Brunning RD. The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood. 2002;100:2292-302.

  21. Kernan NA, Bartsch G, Ash RC, et al. Analysis of 462 transplantations from unrelated donors facilitated by the National Marrow Donor Program. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:593-602.

  22. Bunin NJ, Casper JT, Chitambar C, et al. Partially matched bone marrow transplantation in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. J Clin Oncol. 1988;6:1851-5.

  23. Anderson JE, Appelbaum FR, Fisher LD, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for 93 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood. 1993;82:677-81.

  24. Raza A, Meyer P, Dutt D, et al. Thalidomide produces transfusion independence in long-standing refractory anemias of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2001;98:958-65.

  25. Zorat F, Shetty V, Dutt D, et al. The clinical and biological effects of thalidomide in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Br J Haematol. 2001;115:881-94.

  26. List AF. Use of amifostine in hematologic malignancies, myelodysplastic syndrome, and acute leukemia. Semin Oncol. 1999;26(suppl 7):61-5.

  27. Molldrem JJ, Caples M, Mavroudis D, Plante M, Young NS, Barrett AJ. Antithymocyte globulin for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Br J Haematol. 1997;99:699-705.

  28. Silverman LR, Demakos EP, Peterson BL, et al. Randomized controlled trial of azacitidine in patients with the myelodysplastic syndrome: a study of the cancer and leukemia group B. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2429-40.

  29. Kornblith AB, Herndon JE, 2nd, Silverman LR, et al. Impact of azacytidine on the quality of life of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome treated in a randomized phase III trial: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:2441-52.

  30. Negrin RS, Stein R, Doherty K, et al. Maintenance treatment of the anemia of myelodysplastic syndromes with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and erythropoietin: evidence for in vivo synergy. Blood. 1996;87:4076-81.

  31. Greenberg P, Cox C, LeBeau MM, et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 1997;89:2079-88.

Disclaimer